Caterpillar (CAT)

104 community mentions · Apparel & Footwear
Hit or miss
Mention volume by quarter
Mention volume by quarter for caterpillar-cat202120222023202420252026latest

Summary

The CAT brand spans a surprisingly wide range of consumer goods beyond heavy equipment, and community sentiment is genuinely mixed depending on the product category. Boots draw the most discussion and the most division — some users report decade-plus longevity while others found them among the worst work boots they've tried. Apparel like the Costco work pants and hoodies earns more consistent praise as durable, affordable workwear.

Verdict

CAT apparel (especially Costco work pants) and select boot models earn genuine long-term praise, but significant quality inconsistency across boot generations and the Wolverine manufacturing relationship mean buyers should research specific models carefully rather than trusting the brand name alone.

What people love

Many users highlight long-lasting boots and apparel, especially when purchased at Costco, and appreciate the value relative to premium brands like Carhartt or Red Wing. The rugged CAT smartphones also receive specific praise for near-indestructible durability.

  • Steel toe boots reported lasting 10–15 years with regular use
  • Costco work pants praised as durable and affordable versus Carhartt
  • CAT rugged smartphones noted as genuinely tough for job-site use
  • Rain boots described as waterproof and holding up over 5+ years
  • Shoulder bags and hoodies reported lasting a decade with minimal wear
  • Second Shift boot model specifically called out as tough for the price range

What people criticize

A meaningful minority of users found CAT boots to be the least durable work boots they'd owned, and quality inconsistency across product generations is a recurring concern. The brand's reliance on Wolverine for boot manufacturing and private equity pressure on quality are cited as structural red flags.

  • Boot quality reportedly inconsistent across eras and specific models
  • CAT boots manufactured by Wolverine, raising quality concerns
  • Some users rank CAT boots at the bottom for durability among work boot brands
  • Private equity outsourcing cited as a threat to long-term product quality
  • CAT all-in-one tools (jump starter/inflator combos) described as designed to fail

What people are saying

One user bought the same CAT boot model twice, a decade apart — the first pair was fantastic for five years, but the second pair was absolutely terrible, suggesting significant quality variation over time.
A user wore a pair of CAT steel-toe boots daily for seven years, then handed them to a brother who wore them for another five — outlasting Red Wings that needed sole replacement within three years at three times the price.
A longtime community member noted that CAT is not really a shoe brand, and that their lineup ranges from decent to very bad — likening it to DeWalt or Milwaukee hand tools where the parent brand licenses its name onto inconsistent products.
An arborist reported wearing CAT trademark work pants for eight years, retiring only two pairs, with the only recurring issue being worn velcro on the pockets — an easy fix.