The community draws a sharp line between vintage Cub Cadets built under International Harvester and modern units made by MTD — the former are celebrated as generational heirlooms that routinely outlast 40-50 years of hard use, while the latter are widely criticized as low-quality, unreliable machines. Sentiment is deeply nostalgic for the old product and largely dismissive of the new. A handful of users report positive experiences with modern models, but they are the minority.
Vintage International Harvester-era Cub Cadets are genuine BIFL machines, but modern MTD-produced units have a poor track record that disqualifies them from the same recommendation — making the brand's worthiness entirely dependent on the era of manufacture.
Pre-MTD Cub Cadets, particularly those from the 1960s through early 1990s, are praised as extraordinarily durable machines that can last generations with basic maintenance. Even some modern models with quality engines like Kawasaki or Kohler have satisfied owners.
Modern Cub Cadets made under MTD ownership are frequently called out for poor build quality, non-serviceable transmissions, failing welds, and short lifespans. Multiple users explicitly warn against buying current production models.
One user's grandfather bought a Cub Cadet riding mower the month they were born — and it's still in use 51 years later.
A longtime user who experienced the MTD-era firsthand described their LTX1050 as a constant source of problems, citing a non-serviceable transmission with cooked fluid at just 100 hours — a repair that required removing the entire transaxle.
A mechanic familiar with older Kohler-powered Cub Cadets estimated these vintage machines still have 25 to 35 years of life remaining in them, calling them a buy-it-for-your-grandchildren's-life proposition.
A commercial property maintenance professional explicitly listed Cub Cadet alongside Craftsman, MTD, and Poulan as brands to avoid, calling them overpriced paperweights.