Johnston & Murphy

72 community mentions · Apparel & Footwear
Hit or miss
Mention volume by quarter
Mention volume by quarter for johnston-murphy202120222023202420252026latest

Summary

Johnston & Murphy occupies a middle-tier position in the community's estimation — appreciated for comfort and style at a mid-range price point, but widely noted for a significant decline in quality over recent decades. Older pairs, especially those made in Italy, earned genuine loyalty and lasted years with proper care, while current India-made production draws skepticism from experienced buyers. The community generally views them as a stepping stone brand rather than a true BIFL option.

Verdict

Johnston & Murphy can deliver genuine longevity — particularly older or Italian-made models and the higher-end Collection line — but buyers must specifically seek out Goodyear-welted construction and accept that the brand's current quality no longer matches its reputation, making careful model selection essential.

What people love

Community members consistently praise J&M for comfort and style relative to their price, with older pairs and higher-end 'Collection' models earning particular loyalty. Several users report multi-year or even decade-plus lifespans when shoes are properly maintained and rotated.

  • XC4 line praised for exceptional comfort during high daily step counts
  • Older Italian-made pairs lasted many years with multiple resolings
  • Comfortable enough to break in quickly and mold to feet
  • Leather belts and wallets reported to hold up well over many years
  • Good value for price compared to cheaper alternatives
  • Stylish designs that work across casual and formal settings

What people criticize

The most consistent criticism is a steep quality decline after manufacturing shifted to India, with current models frequently described as glued rather than welted and prone to early failure. Several users explicitly warn against buying J&M as a true BIFL investment.

  • Quality declined sharply after production moved from Italy to India
  • Many current models are cemented, not Goodyear welted, limiting repairability
  • Some users report uppers separating from soles within one to two years
  • Considered clearly inferior to Allen Edmonds for long-term durability
  • Work shoes may need replacement every two years under heavy daily use

What people are saying

A longtime buyer described switching from Bostonian to J&M when both brands were Italian-made, wearing pairs to pieces over many years with multiple resolings — but found that the India-made replacement of the same model failed within a year, with a cobbler declaring it unrepairable.
One commenter noted that their $150 Johnston & Murphys from a decade ago are still holding up well with regular conditioning, but acknowledged that current models from the brand are a very different product than what was available then.
A user who wore J&M collection Italian dress shoes praised them as exceptional, but warned they are expensive even on clearance and require real investment in maintenance to get the full lifespan out of them.
Several experienced buyers advised looking specifically for Goodyear-welted construction within J&M's lineup rather than buying any model blindly, since the brand sells both resoleable and disposable shoes under the same name.