LVMH

90 community mentions · Bags & Luggage
Not recommended
Mention volume by quarter
Mention volume by quarter for lvmh202120222023202420252026latest

Summary

The r/BuyItForLife community views LVMH overwhelmingly negatively as a conglomerate that systematically degrades the quality of brands it acquires while raising prices and expanding into cheaper product lines. LVMH is repeatedly cited as a warning sign for any heritage or quality brand, with community members using acquisition by LVMH as a shorthand for 'avoid this brand now.' The CEO's own stated mission — selling 'desire' rather than quality — is treated as a damning admission.

Verdict

The community treats LVMH ownership as a near-universal disqualifier for BIFL consideration, citing a consistent pattern of post-acquisition quality decline, price increases, and margin-driven product line dilution across multiple brands.

What people love

A small minority of commenters note that LVMH brands still technically exceed fast fashion quality, and that some acquisitions have not yet visibly degraded product quality in the short term.

  • Some LVMH brands still exceed Zara-tier quality in construction
  • Short-term post-acquisition quality sometimes remains unchanged
  • LVMH's marketing capabilities are acknowledged as world-class
  • A few brands like TAG Heuer reportedly improved post-pandemic product lines

What people criticize

The community is nearly unanimous that LVMH acquisitions follow a predictable pattern: raise prices, cut material costs, expand into cheaper SKUs, and ride brand equity until consumers notice the decline. Multiple specific brands — Birkenstock, TAG Heuer, RM Williams, Loro Piana — are cited as casualties of this playbook.

  • Prices routinely increase post-acquisition while quality declines
  • Classic PE playbook: expand SKUs, cheapen materials, maintain brand name
  • Allegations of outsourced labor including forced labor practices
  • Bernard Arnault reportedly places unqualified family members in leadership roles
  • Brand shredding policies criticized as wasteful and environmentally harmful
  • LVMH described as selling 'desire' rather than genuine quality or durability

What people are saying

One highly upvoted commenter noted that if you find a brand that's genuinely worth its price, it will eventually be bought by LVMH or a similar luxury conglomerate and degraded — and the worst part is they don't advertise the acquisition, so the name on the label stays the same.
A commenter explained the classic acquisition playbook in detail: buy a heritage brand, IPO it, optimize for margins, quietly cut material costs, expand into cheaper product lines, and ride the brand equity until customers finally notice.
LVMH's own CEO was cited as saying the company manufactures just one product — desire — which commenters treated as a frank admission that quality is not the priority.
One commenter pointed out that artisans and small leather goods makers could produce comparable items to LVMH designer brands at a fraction of the price, suggesting the conglomerate's value proposition is largely built on logo recognition rather than craftsmanship.