PUR

64 community mentions · Kitchen & Cookware
Hit or miss
Mention volume by quarter
Mention volume by quarter for pur202120222023202420252026latest

Summary

The r/BuyItForLife community has genuinely mixed feelings about PUR. Many users appreciate it as a practical, affordable upgrade over Brita for taste and contaminant reduction, and some have used their units for years without issue. However, a vocal minority considers it outright inferior to alternatives like Berkey or Clearly Filtered, and water filtration specialists note it underperforms on actual contaminant removal.

Verdict

PUR faucet filters offer solid mid-range filtration, good certification credentials, and reasonable durability, but the pitcher line has quality concerns and the product overall isn't a top performer for users with serious contaminant removal needs.

What people love

PUR is widely praised for improving water taste, ease of use, and solid mid-range filtration performance relative to its cost. Its faucet-mounted filters in particular earn repeat recommendations, including from Wirecutter.

  • Effectively removes chlorine taste, outperforming Brita for many users
  • PUR Advanced faucet filter certified for 71 contaminants including particulates
  • Faucet filters praised for easy installation and swivel head design
  • Filters reported to last longer than stated lifespan in real-world use
  • Good customer service — replacement parts sent proactively after breakage
  • Affordable filter replacement costs compared to competitors

What people criticize

Criticism centers on PUR's plastic build quality — pitchers have been reported to crack — and limitations in filtering advanced contaminants like PFAS, arsenic, and pharmaceuticals. A water filtration specialist rated it poorly in independent testing.

  • Pitcher body prone to cracking, leading users to switch brands
  • Underperforms on contaminant reduction compared to Clearly Filtered or Epic pitchers
  • One expert tester rated Brita and PUR weak on actual filtration performance
  • At least one user found it failed to remove unpleasant tap water taste
  • Now owned by Helen of Troy conglomerate, raising concerns about brand quality

What people are saying

A user who tried several filter systems found PUR's water taste comparable to ZeroWater, but with cheaper, longer-lasting filters — and they simply swap it out when the taste starts to decline rather than following a fixed schedule.
A water quality specialist who tests filters professionally noted that no pitcher is truly buy-it-for-life, since filters are consumables and the plastic scratches over time, and rated both Brita and PUR as weak on actual filtration.
A long-term PUR faucet filter user noted the housing has proven durable for years, and PUR proactively sent replacement adapters when the original broke during a move — with no obligation to do so.
One user switched away from ZeroWater to PUR specifically because ZeroWater strips out beneficial minerals, while PUR strikes a better balance between filtering contaminants and preserving healthy mineral content.